This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
NAPGO
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Case Report
    • Conference Abstracts
    • Conference Bulletin
    • Expert Reviews
    • Original Research
    • Systemic Reviews
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:30347/feed
ISSN 2769-5336
Case Report
January 09, 2026 EDT

The Hidden Twin: A Case of Missed Heterotopic Pregnancy Revealed by Rising Beta-hCG Post-Ectopic Removal

Tim Habboub, BS, Mario Pardo-Friedman, MD,
Heterotopic Pregnancy
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.54053/001c.155188
Photo by Vladimir Kramer on Unsplash
NAPGO
Habboub, Tim, and Mario Pardo-Friedman. 2026. “The Hidden Twin: A Case of Missed Heterotopic Pregnancy Revealed by Rising Beta-hCG Post-Ectopic Removal.” North American Proceedings in Gynecology & Obstetrics, January. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.54053/​001c.155188.
Download all (1)
  • Figure 1. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound consistent with 10 weeks and 3 days gestation, demonstrating a gestational sac, yolk sac, fetal pole, and fetal cardiac activity with a heart rate of 187 beats per minute.
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) refers to the implantation of a fertilized ovum outside the uterine cavity, most commonly in the fallopian tube. One key clinical marker is beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), which typically declines following surgical removal of the ectopic tissue. Persistent or rising β-hCG post-removal often suggests incomplete removal, persistent ectopic tissue, or rarely gestational trophoblastic disease. However, a more elusive diagnosis is heterotopic pregnancy (HP), defined as the simultaneous occurrence of both intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancies.
We present the case of a woman who underwent a salpingectomy for a ruptured EP diagnosed at 6 weeks gestation. Four weeks later, her β-hCG levels remained elevated. A transvaginal ultrasound revealed a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) at 10 weeks’ gestation, confirming the diagnosis of HP.
This case underscores the critical importance of comprehensive follow-up evaluation when β-hCG levels remain elevated after EP management. A combination of clinical assessment, serial β-hCG monitoring, point-of-care ultrasound, and formal transvaginal imaging must be employed to exclude the presence of HP and optimize patient outcomes.

Introduction

EP represents a critical obstetric emergency where the fertilized ovum implants outside the endometrial cavity, most frequently in the ampullary segment of the fallopian tube. Though relatively infrequent, occurring in approximately 1–2% of all gestations, it remains a significant contributor to early pregnancy-related maternal morbidity, particularly during the first trimester (“ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy” 2018). Management often necessitates surgical intervention, with salpingectomy being a common approach in tubal cases. Following removal, serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels are expected to decline steadily. Deviations from this expected decline pattern warrant thorough investigation.

Persistently elevated or rising β-hCG after surgery may signal several potential complications. One common explanation is the incomplete excision of trophoblastic tissue, especially following conservative procedures such as salpingostomy, where tissue remnants may continue to produce β-hCG. Alternatively, persistent ectopic gestation, characterized by the ongoing proliferation of viable ectopic trophoblasts, must be considered (van Mello et al. 2012). A less frequent but critical differential is gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, including choriocarcinoma, which typically manifests with aggressive β-hCG elevation and systemic signs (Seckl, Sebire, and Berkowitz 2010). Additionally, HP, the concurrent presence of both intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies, can also account for residual or rising β-hCG (Barrenetxea et al. 2007).

Though heterotopic gestation is rare in spontaneous pregnancies (approximately 1 in 30,000), its prevalence significantly increases in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART), reaching an estimated incidence of 1 in 100 cycles (Wang et al. 2023). Risk factors for HP mirror those for EP and are largely iatrogenic in ART contexts. These include mechanical and technical variables such as the number and site of embryo transfers, embryo quality, the hormonal environment at transfer, and the volume of transfer medium. Additionally, anatomic disruptions due to endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, or prior surgery can contribute to abnormal implantation (Felekis et al. 2014).

Case Report

A 27-year-old gravida 2, para 1 woman with a spontaneously conceive pregnancy at 6 weeks gestation presented to the Emergency Department with acute left lower quadrant abdominal pain and mild vaginal spotting. Quantitative serum β-hCG measured 7,539 mIU/mL. Transabdominal ultrasound failed to identify an intrauterine pregnancy but revealed the presence of free fluid in the pelvis and a small intrauterine pseudosac. Speculum examination demonstrated a normal cervix with scant vaginal bleeding.

Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a normal-appearing uterus and ovaries. However, the left fallopian tube was noted to be dilated and consistent with an EP. Approximately 100 mL of hemoperitoneum was evacuated, and a left salpingectomy was performed. Pathologic examination of the resected fallopian tube confirmed the diagnosis of a tubal ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage and occasional trophoblasts, compatible with tubal (ectopic) pregnancy. No hydropic structures or fetal somatic tissues were identified. These findings were consistent with a tubal ectopic pregnancy and ruled out the possibility of a hydrosalpinx.

The patient did not receive follow-up β-hCG monitoring postoperatively. Four weeks after surgery, she obtained a positive home pregnancy test. Upon evaluation in clinic, the patient was counseled that a new intrauterine pregnancy was unlikely, and the test result was presumed to reflect residual trophoblastic tissue. A serum β-hCG at that time was significantly elevated at 51,414 mIU/mL.

A formal transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound subsequently revealed a viable intrauterine pregnancy consistent with 10 weeks gestation, confirming the diagnosis of a missed intrauterine pregnancy coexisting with a resolved EP: a HP. The fetus demonstrated appropriate growth and viability. The patient elected to continue the pregnancy and initiated prenatal care.

An ultrasound of a baby AI-generated content may be incorrect.
Figure 1.Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound consistent with 10 weeks and 3 days gestation, demonstrating a gestational sac, yolk sac, fetal pole, and fetal cardiac activity with a heart rate of 187 beats per minute.

A fetal anatomy scan performed at 21 weeks gestation demonstrated a single live intrauterine fetus with biometric measurements consistent with normal growth. Detailed evaluation revealed no gross structural abnormalities in the abdomen, three-vessel umbilical cord with normal insertion, kidneys, stomach, bladder, spine, extremities, or face. Intracranial anatomy, including the choroid plexus, lateral ventricles, cerebellum, and cisterna magna, appeared normal. A screening fetal echocardiogram was also within normal limits, with appropriate fetal movements observed throughout the examination.

Discussion

HP is a rare and often overlooked cause of persistent β-hCG after EP removal. The condition presents a diagnostic challenge due to its rarity and clinical overlap with more common obstetric conditions. A substantial proportion of HP cases are asymptomatic (about 50%) until rupture occurs, which often prompts emergency presentation. Reports suggest that up to 78.5% of HPs are diagnosed only after the rupture of the ectopic component, typically the fallopian tube, manifesting as an acute abdomen and hemodynamic instability (Felekis et al. 2014). Such presentations can be indistinguishable from isolated ectopic pregnancies or complicated miscarriages, leading to diagnostic delays. Pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, and signs of peritoneal irritation are not unique to HP and can be misleading, especially when clinicians are not actively considering the possibility of dual gestation (Mohapatra and Samantaray 2022). The limitations of β-hCG monitoring further complicate diagnosis. In normal early pregnancy, β-hCG levels rise predictably, but in the context of HP, a viable intrauterine pregnancy can mask the continued trophoblastic activity of the ectopic gestation. As a result, serum β-hCG levels may rise appropriately, misleading clinicians into presuming a reassuring trajectory. This is particularly problematic when surgical treatment of the EP is presumed complete, and subsequent β-hCG monitoring fails to show the expected decline. β-hCG is a marker of hormonal activity rather than gestational location, making it inherently limited as a diagnostic tool in such scenarios (Felekis et al. 2014). Ultrasound imaging, while central to early pregnancy evaluation, is also susceptible to misinterpretation. Early ectopic pregnancies may appear sonographically similar to other adnexal findings such as hemorrhagic corpus luteum cysts, tubo-ovarian masses, or benign neoplasms, thus increasing the complexity in cases with overlapping pathologies. Such diagnostic ambiguity is especially pronounced in natural conceptions, where suspicion of HP is inherently lower, resulting in delayed diagnosis (Sun et al. 2012).

A thorough diagnostic and post-operative workup are essential in managing ectopic pregnancies in the case of HP to avoid missing other differentials such as trophoblastic tissue remnants. These tissues can penetrate local structures, making their complete removal particularly challenging in conservative approaches such as salpingostomy. Even when the visible ectopic mass is excised, microscopic remnants may remain embedded in the fallopian tube or surrounding peritoneum. This residual tissue can continue to grow or bleed, causing ongoing or delayed internal hemorrhage, hemoperitoneum, or secondary rupture. Additionally, such remnants may lead to localized infection or inflammatory responses, complicating both the clinical picture and recovery. These complications can delay the diagnosis of persistent EP and interrupt timely decision-making in fertility planning. When β-hCG levels fail to decline as expected post-surgery clinical uncertainty may arise, sometimes requiring additional interventions such as methotrexate therapy or a second surgical procedure (Alkatout et al. 2017). Although less common, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia must be considered in any reproductive-aged patient with persistently elevated or rapidly rising β-hCG levels following pregnancy-related events, including EP, miscarriage, molar pregnancy, or elective abortion. This neoplastic process is characterized by its aggressive nature and potential for systemic dissemination, particularly to the lungs, liver, or brain (Meyers et al. 2025). Delayed recognition can result in advanced disease progression, underscoring the need for early exclusion through serial β-hCG monitoring and imaging when appropriate.

Finally, the possibility of HP should not be overlooked when β-hCG trends deviate from expected norms. The discovery of a viable intrauterine pregnancy has critical implications. Early recognition allows for the initiation of prenatal care, including folic acid supplementation, screening for congenital anomalies, and management of maternal conditions such as hypertension or diabetes (Cucinella et al., n.d.). Failure to detect a viable intrauterine pregnancy promptly can delay these interventions and potentially compromise maternal-fetal outcomes. Conversely, when the intrauterine pregnancy is nonviable, retained products of conception can become infected as tissue remaining may lead to endometritis or systemic sepsis if not promptly addressed (Rouse et al. 2019). Equally important is the psychological dimension of post-pregnancy loss care. Many patients experience profound emotional distress following ectopic or failed pregnancies. The uncertainty that often accompanies such diagnoses can lead to confusion, fear, and long-term emotional consequences. Clear communication regarding reproductive status, whether a pregnancy was intrauterine or ectopic, viable or nonviable, can help patients process the experience, regain a sense of control, and engage in future fertility planning with confidence. Providing this information sensitively fosters trust and psychological healing, reinforcing the importance of comprehensive and compassionate care (Hasani et al. 2021).

Conclusion

HP is a rare but crucial diagnosis to consider when β-hCG levels remain elevated after EP removal. Missing an ongoing intrauterine pregnancy delays essential prenatal care and can endanger maternal-fetal health. This case reinforces the need for systematic follow-up, including β-hCG monitoring, comprehensive imaging, and careful clinical judgment. A multidisciplinary approach improves diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.

Submitted: August 07, 2025 EDT

Accepted: December 08, 2025 EDT

References

“ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.” 2018. Obstetrics & Gynecology 131 (3): e91–103. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1097/​AOG.0000000000002560.
Google Scholar
Alkatout, I., U. Honemeyer, K.-G. Noé, C. Eckmann-Scholz, N. Maass, M. Elessawy, and L. Mettler. 2017. “Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities for All Localizations of Ectopic Pregnancy.” International Journal of Women’s Health and Reproduction Sciences 5 (2): 82–89. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.15296/​ijwhr.2017.16.
Google Scholar
Barrenetxea, G., L. Barinaga-Rementeria, A. L. de Larruzea, J. A. Agirregoikoa, M. Mandiola, and K. Carbonero. 2007. “Heterotopic Pregnancy: Two Cases and a Comparative Review.” Fertility and Sterility 87 (2): 417.e9-417.e15. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.fertnstert.2006.05.085.
Google Scholar
Cucinella, G. et al. n.d. “Early Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy Allows Us to Save the Intrauterine Pregnancy.” Manuscript in preparation/unpublished report. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo.
Felekis, T., C. Akrivis, P. Tsirkas, and I. Korkontzelos. 2014. “Heterotopic Triplet Pregnancy after in Vitro Fertilization with Favorable Outcome of the Intrauterine Twin Pregnancy Subsequent to Surgical Treatment of the Tubal Pregnancy.” Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1155/​2014/​356131.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Hasani, S., M. Mirghafourvand, K. Esmaeilpour, and F. Sehhatie Shafaie. 2021. “The Effect of Counseling Based on Health Promotion Awareness on Mental Health and Self-Esteem in Women with Ectopic Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 34 (11): 1687–94. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​14767058.2019.1644314.
Google Scholar
Meyers, M., A. Awada, M. Najmaoui, M. Ilzkovitz, M. Pezzullo, J. Chaves, J. Deviere, et al. 2025. “Metastatic Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Leading to Acute Respiratory Failure and Death: A Case Report – About a Particularly Challenging Management in the Intensive Care Unit, and Exploring the Potential of Pembrolizumab in Treating Frail, Pretreated Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.” Case Reports in Oncology 18 (1): 394–405. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1159/​000543518.
Google Scholar
Mohapatra, I., and S. R. Samantaray. 2022. “Navigating Diagnostic Challenges: Heterotopic Pregnancy versus Hyperdecidual Reaction in Ectopic Gestation.” Cureus 14 (10): e29921. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.7759/​cureus.29921.
Google Scholar
Rouse, C. E., L. O. Eckert, F. M. Muñoz, J. S. A. Stringer, S. Kochhar, L. Bartlett, M. Sanicas, et al. 2019. “Postpartum Endometritis and Infection Following Incomplete or Complete Abortion: Case Definition & Guidelines for Data Collection, Analysis, and Presentation of Maternal Immunization Safety Data.” Vaccine 37 (52): 7585–97. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.vaccine.2019.10.074.
Google Scholar
Seckl, M. J., N. J. Sebire, and R. S. Berkowitz. 2010. “Gestational Trophoblastic Disease.” The Lancet 376 (9742): 717–29.
Google Scholar
Sun, S. Y., E. Araujo Júnior, J. Elito Júnior, L. C. Rolo, F. F. Campanharo, S. G. P. Sarmento, L. M. M. Nardozza, and A. F. Moron. 2012. “Diagnosis of Heterotopic Pregnancy Using Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Report.” Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012:1–4. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1155/​2012/​509694.
Google Scholar
van Mello, N. M., F. Mol, B. C. Opmeer, W. M. Ankum, B. W. Mol, and F. van der Veen. 2012. “Salpingostomy versus Salpingectomy in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.” Human Reproduction Update 18 (6): 593–602.
Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-N., L.-W. Zheng, L.-L. Fu, Y. Xu, and X.-Y. Zhang. 2023. “Heterotopic Pregnancy after Assisted Reproductive Techniques with Favorable Outcome of the Intrauterine Pregnancy: A Case Report.” World Journal of Clinical Cases 11 (3): 669–76. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.12998/​wjcc.v11.i3.669.
Google Scholar

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system